Whats next? The pilot needs to be aware of his intercept angle – preferably between 30 and 45 degrees – to avoid overshooting.ĭont make a long, shaky intercept that puts the aircraft at or beyond the final approach fix. Whats next? The before-landing checklist needs to be accomplished and the aircraft configuration modified as required. Hes asking himself what the next task hell be expected to do is and what the parameters are for that task.Įarly in the transition phase, you slow the aircraft to the low-altitude maneuvering airspeed. An experienced jet pilot doesnt spend much time on what he is doing while climbing to the assigned altitude. One of the biggest problems in training pilots to move from prop planes to jets is to get them to think further ahead. If you get behind the airplane during the transition phase, it can be very difficult to catch up during the rapid intermediate and final phases of the approach. Anticipate what instrument indications to expect and when to expect them. Know the angle that the aircraft is approaching the localizer course and the distance to the localizer course. That means you must know your aircrafts position relative to the inbound localizer course. You need to know how to transition to the localizer final approach course – generally radar vector, DME arc, transition fix, procedure turn or holding pattern. This is where the transition phase comes in. The localizer antenna is located at the far end of the instrument runway.īecause the localizer does not give bearing information, the ILS course indicator wont point right at the localizer unless you happen to be on the extended centerline. The localizer provides the course guidance needed to align the aircraft with the runway centerline. The solution to the problem starts with knowing how the airplane will get into position to fly the localizer. Poorly executed approaches generally start to come apart in the transition phase due to mistakes the pilot makes at that point. Other times they are victimized by the quirks in how the system operates.Ī good ILS approach begins long before the glideslope and localizer needles center. Sometimes the techniques used while flying the ILS approach are at the root of the problem. They cant consistently get locked onto excellent ILS approaches. Unfortunately, many instrument-rated pilots – even some high-time professionals – dont get the most out of the system. The ILS is easy to use, with very clear instrument readings. The systems accuracy is amazing, even in these days of close-tolerance avionics. The precision of the ILS is one thing that makes pilots think they can continue to fly the approach course all the way to the runway, despite not having the runway environment in sight at decision height. The pressures mount to the point that many pilots are extremely reluctant to even think missed approach. The last few hundred feet of the approach requires the greatest amount of concentration and discipline. Sneak-under maneuvers can produce high sink rates and thrust/lift problems at low altitude, so it may be only a matter of time until the worst-case scenario happens. The best estimates indicate that highly experienced pilots – often professionals – are more likely to be involved in a sneak-under-the-glideslope accident than low-time instrument pilots. On the next gamble, he descends a little bit more below the glideslope path – and it works again. The pilot later realizes that remaining on glide slope at decision height would have meant executing a missed approach and possibly a trip to the alternate airport. He drops below the glide path and the runway is straight ahead. An instant later, the strobes are visible. Hes close to decision height and suddenly there are patches of ground appearing intermittently below. The first time a pilot on an ILS approach sneaks under the glide-slope is almost always a situation where he is on an ILS final, approaching minimums.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |